And they showed up your house? Boy, do we live in a police state. -- Sent from my iPad
On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:54 PM, Jeffrey Walton <noloa...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes <t...@byrneit.net> wrote: >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org [mailto:funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org] >>> On Behalf Of Jeffrey Walton >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 6:26 PM >>> To: FunSec >>> Subject: [funsec] Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social >>> Security Number is Not Identity Theft >>> >>> From the folks at the Dataloss Database.... >>> >>> The Colorado Supreme Court has ruled "that using someone else's Social >>> Security number is not identity theft as long as you use your own name >>> with it." .... >>> >>> http://robertsiciliano.com/blog/2010/11/11/colorado-supreme-court- >>> using-a-stolen-social-security-number-is-not-identity-theft/ >>> >> [Tomas L. Byrnes] >> While I would never advocate criminality, it would be poetic justice if >> the SSIDs of all the justices who voted in favor of this SSIDs were >> posted on some website used to sell such data to those looking for >> "clean credit". > Be careful with this one. I criticized a Federal Judge in similar > fashion. The US Marshals showed up at my house in an effort to > "silence through intimidation". The email is pasted below. > >> After all, it is no big deal, according to them. > Haha! > > Jeff > > ========== > > [Sent to the Clerk of the Court] > > Hello, > > Please pass on to Judge Buckles. > > Judge Buckles: I would like to thank you for your recent assassination > in Amburgy v. Express Scripts, Inc. Writing that Ambury did not > demonstrate harm that is ‘actual or imminent, not conjectural or > hypothetical' was appalling. > > The fact of the matter is that the danger is real. One of the first > things those who are negligence do is offer computer and personal > security services to the victims, such as antivirus and credit > monitoring. > > Your ruling is synonymous with, "There's no proof that the thief who > broke into the safe and stole the money will spend the money." I can > only hope that you and your family are the victims of a breach, so you > can endure the mythical threat upon which you base your opinions. > > You are clearly not qualified to preside over issues in the digital > age. Next time, please do all of us a favor and recuse yourself. > > Thanks jackass, > > Jeffrey Walton > Baltimore, MD, US > > [Postscript] > "After data loss, ID theft risk soars" > http://redtape.msnbc.com/2009/11/i-call-them-dear-john-data-letters-because-of-the-bad-news-they-bring-and-their-decidedly-warm-and-fuzzy-tone--dear-consume.html > > _______________________________________________ > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
