Funsec isn't a representative sample of people.

On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Kyle Creyts wrote:

> I am part of the 1%.
> On Jul 19, 2012 2:31 AM, "Drsolly" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > If someone can't be bothered to write their thoughts down, and require me
> > to spend 20 minutes to watch a video giving views that I could have read
> > in one minute, then I'm not going to devote my time to listen to them.
> >
> > Since I haven't heard what he has to say, I cannot comment on his views.
> > Except to point out that 99% of people are as interested in computer
> > security as they are in beetle collecting. And anything that depends on
> > them being more interested than that, or better informed, is doomed.
> >
> > On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah wrote:
> >
> > > Marc Goodman (who I believe is https://twitter.com/FutureCrimes and
> > > http://www.futurecrimes.com/ ) gave a recent TED talk on trends in the
> > use of
> > > high technology in crime:
> > >
> > >
> > http://www.ted.com/talks/marc_goodman_a_vision_of_crimes_in_the_future.html
> > >
> > > The 20 minute talk is frightening, with very little in the way of
> > comfort for the
> > > protection or security side.  He ends with a call for crowdsourcing of
> > protection.
> > >
> > > Now as a transparent society/open source/full disclosure kind of guy, I
> > like the
> > > general idea.  But, as someone who has been involved in education,
> > security
> > > awareness, and professional security training for some time, I see a few
> > problems.
> > > For crowdsourcing to work, you need a critical mass of at least
> > minimally capable
> > > people.  When you are talking about a weather reporting app, that minimal
> > > capability isn't much. When you are talking about detecting cyberwar or
> > > bioweapons, the capability levels are a bit different.
> > >
> > > Just yesterday the PNWER (Pacific NorthWest Economic Region
> > > http://www.pnwer.org/ ) conference became the latest to bemoan the lack
> > of
> > > trained employees.  I rather suspect these constant complaints, since I
> > see lots of
> > > people out of work.  But the people who are whining about employees are
> > just
> > > looking for network admins and such.  We need people with more depth and
> > more
> > > breadth in their backgrounds.  I get CISSP candidates in my seminars who
> > are
> > > network admins who simply want to know a few ACLS for firewalls.  I have
> > to
> > > keep telling them that security professionals need to know more than
> > that.
> > >
> > > Yes, I am privileged to be able to meet a number who *are* interested in
> > learning
> > > everything possible in order to meet any need or problem.  But,
> > relatively
> > > speaking, those are few.  And my sample set tends to be abnormal, in
> > that these
> > > are people who have already shown some interest in training (even if
> > only job
> > > related).  What Goodman is talking about is the general public.  And
> > those of us
> > > who have actually tried security awareness know how little conceptual
> > awareness
> > > we have to build on, let alone advanced technical knowledge.
> > >
> > > I think awareness, self-protection, and crowdsourcing is probably the
> > only good
> > > way to approach the problems Goodman outlines.  I just worry that we
> > have a long
> > > way to go.
> > >
> > > http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/1793
> > >
> > > ======================  (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer)
> > > [email protected]     [email protected]     [email protected]
> > > On Friday, January 23rd, 2004, in a speech at the World Economic
> > > Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Bill Gates stated `Two years from
> > > now, spam will be solved.'
> > > victoria.tc.ca/techrev/rms.htm http://www.infosecbc.org/links
> > > http://blogs.securiteam.com/index.php/archives/author/p1/
> > > http://twitter.com/rslade
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> > > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> > > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> > https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> > Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
> >
> 

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Reply via email to