I'm rarely offended by silliness. (Stupidity is a different thing entirely, but that is another story.)
Blaster Bates? It must be over forty years since I heard 'The shower of s--t over Cheshire' and just thinking about it still makes me chortle. -- David Harley CITP FBCS CISSP Small Blue-Green World ESET Senior Research Fellow -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of peter evans Sent: 26 August 2013 08:12 To: FunSec List Subject: Re: [funsec] Explosive breast implants Note, contains silliness, if you are easily offended, you shouldn't be here. And now, Bunniworks tries to take this to the illogical conclusion. On Aug/22.16:04:04, Blanchard, Michael (InfoSec) wrote: > So if that's the case.... Is there an application available online to start working at the TSA as pat down officer? :) > I think the opposite would be more fun. Having lots of TSA agents have their hands blown off by a disproportionate rise in boob bombers would soon put men in their place. Finally, the TSA would get the respect they deserve.[1] Big breasts would become scary. Chesty Morgan's critical masses (past tense?) would cause airport evacuation scares! The NRA would allow suitably stacked women (and men, don't forget the moobies!) to join as special members. Legal chaos ensues as certain women (and flabby men) are classified as terrorists by a gender challenged Department of Hopeless Security. The artificial hand business would be laughing, until someone invented cheap robots, but it's not the same is it. To quote an old saying, "There's no use looking if you can't touch." Robot hands with feedback become the next big thing after exploding furbies.[2] Bomb Disposal experts will have new stories to tell (anyone remember Blaster Bates?) "There was this woman see... There's always a woman you know, but sometimes they are a man. Anyway, these moobies were the size of medicine balls and the safeties were all introverted..." Shortly thereafter, girly bars would have big signs saying stuff like "Genuine REAL thingummies, SAFE! NON EXPLOSIVE!" "Bring your own gauntlets!" "Gauntlet warmers inside!" etc. And then the sex education books would change slowly too. As a global replacement of "nipple" with "safety" ... "breast" with "bomb" ... H. Rider Haggard would rotate in his grave, somewhere near the bombs of sheba. Do not touch the safety, the breasts may be inadvertently armed with possibly calamitous effect. And of course, those with pierced nipples would be much safer! But don't go too far with that global replacement. Those things they use on baby bottles are actually safeties already. P ps: Oh, that infamous superbowl incident^Wyawn would have them stormed by the boob disposal squad and safely detonated. Which actually sounds like an improvement IMHO. [1] concentrated acetic cid squirters might be an acceptable substitute for exploding ones. [2] These should be easy and will control the furby over-grazing problems simply and dramatically. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list. _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
