OK, so it another "new, unproven hot-fix"?
Sounds like we're well on our way to the good 'ol days of multiple versions of FB files floating around. Ken -----Original Message----- From: Tom Nunamaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 12:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: cferror Of course its a modified core file. The only change to the API I saw was changing fusebox.layout to fusebox.content, but I think both work. In simple terms, John just added a way to execute multiple fuseactions with one call. -----Original Message----- From: Lee Borkman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 8:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cferror John, Are you saying that FuseQ does not involve a modified set of core files, and does not involve any extensions to the API? That is certainly not what I understand from reading all the available info, ie the CFNORTH session blurb, which says "FuseQ is a Fusebox 3 compliant set of core files that provide added capabilities to Fusebox." FrontOfQ(), for example, sure looks an API extension. As has been said a few time sbefore, enquiring minds want to know ;-) LeeBB ----- Original Message ----- From: John Quarto-vonTivadar ... the last thing you want to do is to start using some new, unproven hot-fix ... -- again the advantage being that anyone working with FuseQ doesn't have to modify the core file or create new fusebox API variables ... ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
