Just to clear any misunderstandings, Erik and I did not release the FEX core files as "competition" to anyone or any process. FuseQ and FEX seem to accomplish two different things in two different ways. It is up to Fusebox users to decide what is best for them, and it is up to the Standards Committee to adopt or address any systems that appear along the lines of FuseQ or FEX.
NAT > -----Original Message----- > From: hal helms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 2:50 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: cferror > > > The point of having a standards committee was to have a single standard > that people can innovate around. That's exactly what Nat and Erik have > done and I commend them for tackling the issue. That's also what John > has done with FuseQ, and I've already expressed my enthusiasm for his > solution to multiple issues. > > We want a single standard that all core files must support but one that > doesn't straight-jacket people from making innovations and improvements. > I personally think this is a very good thing. The idea that all good > ideas will come from a couple of people is clearly wrong. ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
