I'm pretty sure this was the point of renaming the methodology part "FLiP", but you may be talking about something different. By separating the methodology, Flip, from the framework, FB3, this makes it much easier to talk about the two separately...
David Huyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nate Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 3:51 PM Subject: A suggestion for FuseBox viability. . . A suggestion for FuseBox. Seperate it - Official FuseBox Methodology - Methodologies can be contained in a document and require no files. They explore best practices for approaching common development tasks. Official FuseBox Framework - This is basically what FB3 is. It can require files, and take care of issues on a coding level. You can add the handling of errors and exceptions and other widgets. Most importantly, it can cater to specific languages. I think many people are turned off by the fact that the FuseBox methodology is now a framework. This also makes it impossible to actually port FB as a methodology over to other languages like ASP and JSP. I think if the "FB Steer" folks got back to the basics of developing FuseBox as a methodology, and framework for those interested in it, -seperately- you would see many doors open to expanding FB concept on a much larger scale. And no, I don't think this post belongs in community, and therefore - I will not take it there. =) Everyone's thoughts on this? Nate Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: [email protected] EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================
