RE: A suggestion for FuseBox viability. . .

[Timothy Heald]

>This also makes it impossible to actually port FB as a methodology over to other languages like ASP and JSP.   There are both JSP and PHP implementations of FB 3, in addition to the CF one.   Now for the rest.  I agree with you, and if you look at it, that's why we have FLiP. I think that as FB continues to mature you will see well defined separation between the methodology/best practices piece, and the application framework.  Now as far as ASP is concerned, well MS has not built dynamic includes into that language, and people are out there right now trying to make it work with com objects and stuff (keep in mind I know almost no ASP).   Give the new structure some time, and it will produce :)   Tim Heald ACP/CCFD :) Application Development www.schoollink.net -----Original Message----- From: JME Maxwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 4:49 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: A suggestion for FuseBox viability. . . I agree completely.   JME -----Original Message----- From: Nate Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 4:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: A suggestion for FuseBox viability. . . A suggestion for FuseBox.  Seperate it -   Official FuseBox Methodology  -  Methodologies can be contained in a document and require no files.  They explore best practices for approaching common development tasks.   Official FuseBox Framework - This is basically what FB3 is.  It can require files, and take care of issues on a coding level.  You can add the handling of errors and exceptions and other widgets.  Most importantly, it can cater to specific languages.   I think many people are turned off by the fact that the FuseBox methodology is now a framework.  This also makes it impossible to actually port FB as a methodology over to other languages like ASP and JSP.   I think if the "FB Steer" folks got back to the basics of developing FuseBox as a methodology, and framework for those interested in it, -seperately- you would see many doors open to expanding FB concept on a much larger scale.   And no, I don't think this post belongs in community, and therefore - I will not take it there.   =)   Everyone's thoughts on this?     Nate Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]       ==^================================================================ This email was sent to: archive@jab.org EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrFMa.bV0Kx9 Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail! http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register ==^================================================================