You must excuse me. I must have missed your answers. The first refers to the crewmen apparently able to give evidence about Israeli intentions.
The questions were: Unless the surviving crewmembers are psychic, I do not expect them to have known the intentions of the Israelis other than that they were trying to sink their ship. They can certainly claim that was the objective, because it was. But, otherwise, all they know was they were thoroughly shot up. If Johnson had ordered all American warships to take station 100 miles away from the conflict, I wonder what the Liberty was doing there. Why didn't she leave with all the others? What possible advantage could Israel get from the attack? It achieved nothing, and could only cause trouble with her only ally. Thanks! Harry ********************************** Henry George School of Social Science of Los Angeles. Box 655 Tujunga CA 91042 818 352-4141 ********************************** > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Christoph Reuss > Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2007 12:18 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Futurework] with friends & gov't like these, who > needs al-Qaeda? > > Harry Pollard said to Lawry de Bivort: > > Three questions occurred to me which I felt sure you could > > answer to my satisfaction, but you won't answer them. > > > > Maybe you can't answer these simple questions. > > I already answered them, if that's good enough. > > HTH, > Chris > > > > _______________________________________________ > Futurework mailing list > Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca > http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
