Your final sentence "This is a most fascinating change-point in history" is the most apt description.
IQ is not necessarily the best gauge of Presidential ability. Probably the worst recent President was Jimmy Carter, a thoroughly nice individual with a high IQ, but ouch!
However, Carter was almost an accident. A surprise to everyone.
The deliberate political intention to become President requires qualities that do not necessarily make one the right person for the job. American Presidents, just like the "leaders" of other lands, are not particularly successful. We can be grateful if they "make do" accomplishing a rare success without doing to much harm.
Bush actually did something with American power and Blair did the right thing by allying Britain to the US. Every prediction of absolute doom so far has been shown to be wrong - and even silly - remember 800,000 dead in Baghdad alone?
Most problems until now have been the byproducts of success. We did the job too quickly and efficiently. We weren't prepared for the suddenness of our victory.
As I said, I thought the chance of finding WMD weren't high. I also think it doesn't matter. Yet, that's where Western criticism is at the moment.
As soon as utilities are effective again, the Iraqi will be happy again, though they'll be looking for relatives in the mass graves for a time There are still 'enemy' out there who have lost their premium positions under Saddam are now angrily like everyone else. They'll be dangerous for a while.
Iran and Syria have been told in no uncertain measure "Stay!"
They have.
The Israeli/Palestinian dialogue is perhaps about to occur. I pointed out earlier that this had begun before the war ended. Whether successful or not, Bush has maneuvered the best chance of resolving the insoluble perhaps ever.
If Bush manages the impossible, what will you say then? But, of course, both of us hope he will.
Harry ------------------------------------------ Keith wrote:
Harry,
At 11:34 27/05/2003 -0700, you wrote:Keith,
Or perhaps it won't fail.
We'll have to see.
Would you concede that an American President who is prepared to act rather than talk, who has just completed a successful war with minimum casualties on all sides against an enemy of Israel, might have a decisive effect on a somewhat implacable Israel?
Bush could certainly have a decisive effect on Israel-Palestine, but if Sharon starts making objections and there's a stalemate then Bush will take his side, not the Palestinians'. I don't see America's long-term partiality to Jewry changing much in the coming years.
Unlike Clinton, Bush offers the aspect of someone who means what he says. He also controls the money that keeps both Israel and Palestine going.
That's true and he'll keep sending the money to Israel.
I'm coming to belief that the problem is more Palestinian than Israeli. The Israeli "occupation" as Sharon called it may end. Palestine must quickly form a government and Arafat must release control of the several security services he presently holds.
I think the problem is now so complex that only force majeure will solve it. Constructively, it could be done by the imposition of fair boundaries on the two nations by America. In fact (I fear) the force majeure will be applied by the Israelis against the Palestinians and the Americans will supply the former with whatever they need by way of munitions.
My fear at the moment is that the settlements may be destroyed in the Israeli withdrawal. They should be placed in the hands of Palestinians by the new Government. (Think of that political Pandora's Box.)
Saw a bit of Bush this morning. He was chatting amiably with a bunch of baseball people at some kind of ceremony. He joked, made allusions to some inside baseball stuff, generally was most relaxed.
He is certainly able chat to baseball people! But ring me up (reverse the charges) when you next see him talking socially to anyone halfway intelligent -- doctors, say, or scientists, or international politicians or university deans or even, so help me, a bunch of CEOs.
Didn't see any of the Gnomes of the Beltway handing him a script, or prompting him, He was on his own as a former President of a baseball franchise.
Rather, as he has been on several occasions that I have seen. Notably that Press Conference, where he walked alone some 40-50 feet up to the podium - then engaged the Press for about 50 minutes, as I recall.
On any one occasion he has a bunch of carefully prepared statements and he won't depart much, if at all, from those.
Once again, Harry, I have absolutely nothing against the guy. He is about of average intelligence and the product of his minders ever since he went into politics. The point is that someone of average intelligence is simply not good enough to be a leader (in any real sense of the word) of a complex and powerful nation.
No other President has appeared before the Press without a covey of handlers with him. Also, I can't remember another President spending so much time with the Press. Usually someone from their 'covies' tells the President to end the session.
I see a different President from the one who is reviled in the Press and elsewhere. I do see the BBC news every night. (Channel Four News used to be on over here, but I can't find it. Maybe it has been discontinued.)
The BBC is definitely biassed against America, and particularly against Bush. That's a good reason for every American and Canadian to watch it. For they'll see anti-American opinions that perhaps will never be heard on our newscasts - except with accompanied amazement. "How can they?"
Bush now has a reputation. I hope he won't lose his nerve, but will use his successes to bring a peace of some sort to the Middle East.
Snowflake in hell's chance, I'm afraid. I wish you were right but I'm extremely doubtful.
But let's not get too excited about all this. Time will tell and let's hope that there's time for both of us to see who is right about Bush. This is a most fascinating change-point in history.
Keith Hudson
**************************************************** Harry Pollard Henry George School of Social Science of Los Angeles Box 655 Tujunga CA 91042 Tel: (818) 352-4141 -- Fax: (818) 353-2242 http://home.attbi.com/~haledward ****************************************************
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.484 / Virus Database: 282 - Release Date: 5/27/2003
