Treasure Beach must have been painful!

Ed


----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Chinese as the world language? was: Re:
[Futurework] Languages (fwd)


> Ed,
>
> You wrote:
>
>         However, the dialects that Cockneys, rural Jamaicans and perhaps
> Quebecois
>         use may also be based on the fact that they don't want you, as an
> outsider,
>         to know what they are saying.
>
> Good point but more true for the highly educated than for the minimally
> educated.
>
> Mandeville is very pretty. The problem with St. Elizabeth is the drug
> trade.  Treasure Beach is not that bad off, I believe:
>
>         http://www.treasurebeach.net/
>
> This is where we stayed during the field courses.
>
> Bill
>
>
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:47:46 -0400 "Ed Weick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hi again Bill,
> >
> > I wanted to say more in my last email, but got called down to
> > breakfast.
> > The closest I got to St. Elizabeth was Mandeville, a beautiful
> > little city
> > in the uplands.  Places I regret not having got to are the Cockpit
> > Country
> > and the Blue Mountains where escaped slaves, Maroons, established
> > their
> > communities, held off the British and finally negotiated peace
> > treaties with
> > them.  My map of Jamaica shows me that the Cockpit Country is just
> > to the
> > north of St. Elizabeth Parish.  However, it may not be a good place
> > to go.
> > My map tells me that the southwest corner of the Cockpit Country is
> > known as
> > "Me no sen you no come".  Interesting name!
> >
> > On the matter of Patois, I've had similar experiences to your in
> > Quebec.  At
> > one time, I was pretty good at French and could understand what
> > people were
> > saying to me, but there were cases in which I couldn't understand
> > what they
> > were saying to each other.  What Quebecois use in the villages and
> > on the
> > streets may, as Ray suggests, be based on a more ancient form of
> > French.
> > However, the dialects that Cockneys, rural Jamaicans and perhaps
> > Quebecois
> > use may also be based on the fact that they don't want you, as an
> > outsider,
> > to know what they are saying.
> >
> > Ed
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "William B Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2003 7:02 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Futurework] Chinese as the world language? was: Re:
> > [Futurework] Languages (fwd)
> >
> >
> > > Ed,
> > >
> > > I have spent a lot of time in St. Elizabeth Parish in Jamaica and
> > have
> > > become accustomed to speaking with rural Jamaicans but when two
> > rural
> > > Jamaicans shift completely into Patawa [Patois], although it is
> > English I
> > > am hard pressed to follow. This is similar to a time when I was
> > ordering
> > > tickets at a counter in London. The guy who spoke perfect English
> > [not
> > > American], picked up the phone and switched into Cockney and I
> > didn't get
> > > anything.
> > >
> > > Bill
> > >
> > > On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 09:38:51 -0400 "Ed Weick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > writes:
> > > > Keith:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm sure you must be right. However, Quebecian French will die
> > in
> > > > the end
> > > > > if Quebec wants to stay in the mainstream of the developed
> > world.
> > > > When is
> > > > > another matter. It's interesting that the French Academy have
> > > > given up
> > > > > their long-time attempts to exclude American and English word
> > > > imports.
> > > > > Almost all middle class Frenchmen, Germans, Italians, Dutch
> > and
> > > > > what-have-you can speak fairly fluent English because that's
> > the
> > > > language
> > > > > of modern commerce and science. Almost no middle class
> > Englishmen
> > > > could
> > > > put
> > > > > more than a sentence or two together in another language.
> > Once
> > > > upon a time
> > > > > I used to be able to read Simenon and Pushkin in their own
> > > > languages
> > > > fairly
> > > > > comfortably -- and  enjoyably, too -- but I could never speak
> > the
> > > > languages.
> > > >
> > > > One has to appreciate that there is a difference between street
> > > > French and
> > > > the French spoken by the educated.  My understanding is that
> > the
> > > > latter
> > > > speak French, as in France, with perhaps some minor differences.
> >  My
> > > > neice's
> > > > daughter, who attends the French language University of
> > Montreal, is
> > > > off to
> > > > the Sorbonne next year.  She's already done some of her studies
> > in
> > > > France
> > > > and has encountered no problems.
> > > >
> > > > It's interesting how languages evolve.  When I was in Jamaica a
> > few
> > > > years
> > > > ago, I had to go way back into the hill country to talk to some
> > > > elderly
> > > > people who had lived there all their lives.  Though they spoke
> > > > English, I
> > > > could barely understand them.  Another generation or so of
> > > > isolation, and I
> > > > might not be able to.
> > > >
> > > > Ed Weick
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > At 10:39 22/08/2003 -0400, Ed Weick wrote:
> > > > > >(KH)
> > > > > >But surely, Prof Daniel Abrams' thesis is *not* valid. He is
> > > > trying to
> > > > > >maintain that minority languages can be protected.  I
> > originally
> > > > wrote
> > > > > >that this is not possible. PW, EW and I have each been
> > saying
> > > > that once a
> > > > > >new way of life becomes communicable, tradable and
> > geographically
> > > > > >possible, then minority languages disappear. Prof Abrams
> > would do
> > > > better
> > > > > >to spend his time and research money in recording as many
> > > > minority
> > > > > >languages as possible for future study and analysis, than
> > trying
> > > > to save
> > > > > >them in the here and now while our present type of economic
> > > > system is
> > > > > >still sweeping the world.
> > > > >
> > > > > (EW)
> > > > > >Much would seem to depend on the size, status and power of
> > the
> > > > linguistic
> > > > > >group.  There is no doubt in my mind that Quebec will
> > maintain
> > > > French and
> > > > > >do its governing and business in French in the foreseeable
> > > > future.  The
> > > > people
> > > > > >it will deal with in Ottawa will have to be able to use
> > French.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm sure you must be right. However, Quebecian French will die
> > in
> > > > the end
> > > > > if Quebec wants to stay in the mainstream of the developed
> > world.
> > > > When is
> > > > > another matter. It's interesting that the French Academy have
> > > > given up
> > > > > their long-time attempts to exclude American and English word
> > > > imports.
> > > > > Almost all middle class Frenchmen, Germans, Italians, Dutch
> > and
> > > > > what-have-you can speak fairly fluent English because that's
> > the
> > > > language
> > > > > of modern commerce and science. Almost no middle class
> > Englishmen
> > > > could
> > > > put
> > > > > more than a sentence or two together in another language.
> > Once
> > > > upon a time
> > > > > I used to be able to read Simenon and Pushkin in their own
> > > > languages
> > > > fairly
> > > > > comfortably -- and  enjoyably, too -- but I could never speak
> > the
> > > > languages.
> > > > >
> > > > > Although I think that English is a strong candidate as a
> > world
> > > > language, I
> > > > > wouldn't bet on it. Chinese is a much stronger candidate in
> > the
> > > > longer
> > > > > term. It is basically easier to learn than most others. It
> > has
> > > > lost all
> > > > the
> > > > > appendages that other languages still have -- conjugations,
> > > > declensions,
> > > > > irregular verbs, subjunctives, ablatives, and so on --
> > nightmares
> > > > that
> > > > > plagues learners of most other languages. Chinese has also
> > lost
> > > > > inflections, cases, persons, genders, degrees, tenses,
> > voices,
> > > > moods,
> > > > > affixes, infinitives, participles, gerunds and articles. It
> > lost
> > > > all these
> > > > > in the course of several thousand years of a largely unified
> > > > culture and
> > > > > literature.  There are no words of more than one syllable and
> > > > every word
> > > > > has only one form. It proceeds by means of subject and
> > predicate
> > > > -- that's
> > > > > all -- and explicates by means of metaphors. Thousands of
> > them.
> > > > Tens of
> > > > > thousands of them. More poetry has been written in Chinese
> > than in
> > > > any
> > > > > other language.
> > > > >
> > > > > Chinese is just about the most finely chiselled language in
> > the
> > > > world --
> > > > > the most fully developed.  And when China gets to the
> > forefront
> > > > in
> > > > science,
> > > > > technology and commerce I think it will probably whop the
> > confused
> > > > and
> > > > > convoluted language that we call English (much as I love it).
> > > > >
> > > > > Keith Hudson
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Keith Hudson, 6 Upper Camden Place, Bath, England,
> > > > > <www.evolutionary-economics.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Futurework mailing list
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Futurework mailing list
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________________________________________
> > > The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
> > > Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
> > > Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Futurework mailing list
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
> >
> >
> >
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
> Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
> Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to