As I
said. There is no incentive to change. I hate to say it but food
banks are part of the problem.
arthur
But what's the
solution? People that use the foodbanks are not activists. Most have
no faith in politicians and many dropped out of the system long ago.
Middle class donors want to keep giving pasta and tuna because it makes them
feel they are doing something. Newly elected politicians discover, to
their horror, that the previous government has left them a mess, just as their
government will leave a mess to be discovered by the next government.
There are organizations that are active on behalf of the poor, but they make
little headway against neo-con governments concerned with the bottom line.
Movements toward a GAI based on direct payments or a negative income tax appear
to have stalled a decade ago. Public concern now is not about the poor,
but about personal safety and security in the face of terror and a downsizing
economy.
I was a kid in
Saskatchewan when the newly elected government, under Tommy Douglas, first
brought in programs like universal health coverage. There was a
receptivity to social programming at the time because people remembered the
Great Depression and not being able to afford visits to the doctor. The
cooperative movement was still a strong feature of the Canadian social
landscape. The poor were considered respectable. They were us
and our neighbours, good church going people who just wanted a "square
deal".
What has changed most
since then is our attitude toward the poor. The proportion of the
population that considers itself
middle class has grown enormously, while the poor, now crowded down to the
bottom as minimum wage earners and welfare recipients, are no longer
respectable. They are seen as flawed losers who must be forced to
mend their ways through upgrading and workfare programs.
My diagnosis is that
programs that were once considered new and even radical, like universal
Medicare, employment insurance, the Canada Pension Plan, the Child Tax Benefit,
and various Provincial welfare programs have now become part of
the accepted background buzz of daily life. They are old
and tired and just there, no longer really interesting. And people who
work for large organizations have good pension, drug and dental plans.
People who are not really well-off but who, via double or even
triple incomes, manage to stay above low income cut-offs, can convince
themselves they are doing OK by buying the latest status goods, as Keith Hudson
calls them. They abhor the thought of paying more taxes to reinforce the
health and social safety net because that would cut into their ability to buy an
SUV, even if they have to buy a used one.
It's the kind of world
that does not suggest the possibility of revolutionary change. Something
cataclysmic would have to happen to shake us out of it. Personally, I hope
it doesn't because I enjoy my middle class life style. Yet I know that
major social change has always depended on drastic events. It would
seem that revolutionary programming, like the Canadian social
programming that followed WWII, has always eventually begotten encrustation
and that something rather nasty, like a major economic downturn, has to
happen to get us unencrusted. Until that happens, I'll keep
helping to operate a food bank because even the poor need the comfort of
food.
Ed
|
Title: Re: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David Ricardo, Caveman Trade vs. Modern Trade
- Re: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] Dav... Ray Evans Harrell
- Re: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David Ricard... Ray Evans Harrell
- RE: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David R... Harry Pollard
- Re: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] Dav... Robert E. Bowd
- RE: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David Ricard... Cordell . Arthur
- Re: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David R... Ray Evans Harrell
- Re: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David R... Ed Weick
- RE: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David Ricard... Cordell . Arthur
- RE: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David Ricard... Cordell . Arthur
- RE: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David Ricard... Cordell . Arthur
- RE: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David Ricard... Cordell . Arthur
- RE: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David Ricard... Cordell . Arthur
- Re: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David R... Ray Evans Harrell
- RE: Slightly extended (was Re: [Futurework] David R... Harry Pollard