Ray,
It is likely that everyone across the work rewards those who contribute
to them and punishes those that harm them. Americans can spend their money
anyway they like.
Meantime, you continue to mix chalk and cheese.
You take various examples of government intervention and call it a
cutthroat world, even though the various classical people you mention were
against such government intervention.
I have no idea how your mind can somehow link government intervention
with no government intervention, but you keep doing it. Worse, you seem unaware
you are doing it.
"Cutthroat competition", "Law of the Jungle" and similar phrases have
been used for a long time by protectionist capitalists and the 57 varieties of
socialists (you'll remember Heinz soup).
The capitalists know that market competition cuts their profits so they
are against it. They are joined by the socialists for more peculiar
reasons. Socialists are supposed to represent the people, yet they don't
trust them to make their own decisions. They feel they have the wise men and
women in government who can far better decide what the housewife wants than she
can. (Actually, a British Labor government socialist - Douglas Jay - said just
that before 'Public Relations' was firmly in place.)
Now, they just think it, but keep their mouths
shut. It certainly seems that
these government PooBahs hold the
general population in some contempt. Otherwise they wouldn't keep trying to deny
them their freedom to choose.
When you think of the free market, free trade, laissez-faire try to
remember Leonard Read's admonition - "Do as you wish, but harm
no-one.".
I rather prefer "Do as you wish, but coerce no-one."
Whichever you prefer, try to base your thinking on the individual rather
than the State.
Harry
********************************************
Henry George School of Social Science of Los Angeles Box 655 Tujunga CA 91042 Tel: 818 352-4141 -- Fax: 818 353-2242 http://haledward.home.comcast.net ******************************************** From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Evans Harrell Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:18 AM To: Keith Hudson; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Futurework] Are they going mad? You know I don't like Bush Keith but, I think you haven't
thought the context of this through. First of all America is a
business nation and Bush has a Masters in Business Administration from
Harvard. In American business you punish those who don't support you
and reward those who do. It is that simple. It may make
lousy government but frankly with our huge tax bill over this war, the idea of a
company bringing in money to another country that isn't sharing doesn't strike
me all that well either. We don't exist for the rest of the
world but for our own people. The justification for this war was an
attack on our own people and for that reason the American public support Bush on
this. What we don't support is corruption and over charging by
American corporations like Halliburton. Halliburton supported
Bush and now they are sacrificing little and making a killing. That
may hurt Bush but your comments are not resonant over here. They are
more anxiety from a distance and speak to your self interest rather than
ours. Its not morality or even good government, in fact its nothing
personal, its just business.
If you don't like it then argue with the market and stop
preaching free trade and TNC's as the saviour of the future. The US
is just a TNC competeing in the world and it doesn't care about any competitor's
market share other than their own. In that Laissez Faire world, the
only security is power and loyalty and if you want that world you can't
complain when power is asserted. That is what I meant when I said
that government as business is a nightmare. You said you didn't get
it and now you are complaining about it. I don't understand
that. I speak English, maybe you should learn to speak a little
Cherokee. Then we could get around these
misunderstandings.
Perhaps it would be good for Europe to do the same
since we both are going to be dealing with each other for a long time in
this cutthroat world that Ricardo, Adam Smith, Henry George, J.S. Mill and
their accolytes have finally given us, not to mention the current
varieties like Milton Friedman, etc. etc. I don't know
whether it is evolutionary in the sense of the brain or just inevitable given
the history of the past thousand years of European systems.
But either way it was predictable. As Harrison Ford said to
Julia Ormond in the movie Sabrina after he had treated her shabbily,
"Don't worry, it was nothing personal, it was just
business." He didn't like it and felt like a cad but felt
perfectly at home in the more's of the business system. Or as
Donald Trump says: "Get Even!" But "getting
even" isn't personal, it just a business strategy to reward those who contibute
to your business and punish those who don't. Personally
I prefir the complexity of Veblin to the whole bunch.
From my standpoint, everything is personal.
That is different.
REH
--- |
- [Futurework] Are they going mad? Keith Hudson
- Re: [Futurework] Are they going mad? Ed Weick
- Re: [Futurework] Are they going mad? Ed Weick
- RE: [Futurework] Are they going mad? Harry Pollard
- Re: [Futurework] Are they going mad? Ed Weick
- Re: [Futurework] Are they going mad? Ray Evans Harrell
- RE: [Futurework] Are they going mad? Harry Pollard
- Re: [Futurework] Are they going mad? Ray Evans Harrell
- Re: [Futurework] Are they going mad? Keith Hudson
- Re: [Futurework] Are they going mad? Harry Pollard
- Re: [Futurework] Are they going mad? wbward
- RE: [Futurework] Are they going mad? Cordell . Arthur
- Re: [Futurework] Are they going mad? Ray Evans Harrell
- RE: [Futurework] Are they going mad? Cordell . Arthur
- Re: [Futurework] Are they going mad? Ed Weick
- RE: [Futurework] Are they going mad? Cordell . Arthur
- RE: [Futurework] Are they going mad? Christoph Reuss
- RE: [Futurework] Are they going mad? Harry Pollard
- Re: [Futurework] Are they going mad? Ray Evans Harrell
- RE: [Futurework] Are they going mad? creuss