On 06 Jun 2003 10:12:57 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 07:38:12AM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > > > I'm speaking about tarball size, not executable size. > > > > So it will be 2283442 instead of 2243442 for each new logo. Why not? > > Because the gain you get for the additional size is close to zero. > It's against the philosophy fvwm development always hung on to.
Well, for me it is vice versa, the gain is big (more happy users) and the cost is close to zero (we already build in a logo in several variants). But I don't want to force it. Regards, Mikhael. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
