Alex Wallis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dan Espen wrote: > > > > Alex Wallis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > > > > > > > > I don't see a problem to distribute 2-3 logos in 3 variants (or include > > > > them all into C source if they are xpm/xbm). > > > > > > How about including new banners in an updated fvwm-icons package? Then > > > it is left up to the users themselves if they want to upgrade those or > > > not? > > > > I think Mikhael is trying to upgrade the builtin banner > > which I think is a good idea. > > > > I also agree with Dominik, we should strive to > > keep the base package as small as possible. > > > > I agree with both of them too, but I thought the disagreement was about > extra banners and not the default built-in. Sorry if I misunderstood.
Oops. Too early for me. Yep, rereading the original proposal, I don't see the need either. One banner will do. The builtin color limiting should take care of the color options. I only really care about the default banner looking better. -- Dan Espen E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
