=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jes=FAs?= Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 00:44:09 +0100 > Jes=FAs Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Conditionals patch revised and attached. > > Is it valid? Does it lack something? > > My idea is to shorten the list of available patches as much as we can by=20 > including those that are evidently clean, useful and harmless upstream. > That way, we can ease the process for the rest of the patches.
Except for not updating test cases (which almost no one is doing), it looks clean and reasonable to me. -- Dan Espen E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
