On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 03:10:32AM +0100, Jesús Guerrero wrote: > On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:34:03 -0500 > Dan Espen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jes=FAs?= Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 00:44:09 +0100 > > > Jes=FAs Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Conditionals patch revised and attached. > > > > > > Is it valid? Does it lack something? > > > > > > My idea is to shorten the list of available patches as much as we can > > > by=20 > > > including those that are evidently clean, useful and harmless upstream. > > > That way, we can ease the process for the rest of the patches. > > > > Except for not updating test cases (which almost no one is doing), > > it looks clean and reasonable to me. > > I saw that file and plan to update it. I just need to watch into it > to understand the logic of the thing. Feel free to give any advice if > you feel that there's something relevant that I should know. > > For now, I have a preliminary versions with that file included. Attached. > -- > Jesús Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> diff -U5 -r fvwm/ChangeLog fvwm/ChangeLog Please open a separate thread per patch series. This one has long become unmanageable. Ciao Dominik ^_^ ^_^ P.S.: Ich lese E-Post nur zweimal täglich. -- Dominik Vogt
