On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 05:48:25PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > Thomas Adam <tho...@fvwm.org> writes: > > > On 19 July 2012 22:11, Dan Espen <des...@verizon.net> wrote: > >> I'm guessing the other fvwm developers are okay with going to asciidoc? > > > > No. I have an attempt at this, but it's not finished. We either use > > groff or nothing, and I don't mean groff backported from some > > conversion tool. If you don't know groff, start learning. > > I thought since you were making the attempt, you thought asciidoc would > be a good direction to go in.
Yes it will be when it's ready. It's pretty much done, bar some plugging in scripts so it builds. But until I can finish that and then rip out the other docs, having it in Asciidoc means we can't use it, and that's bad. -- Thomas Adam -- "Deep in my heart I wish I was wrong. But deep in my heart I know I am not." -- Morrissey ("Girl Least Likely To" -- off of Viva Hate.)