Thomas Adam <tho...@fvwm.org> writes: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:11:56PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 06:07:44PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: >> > Dominik Vogt <dominik.v...@gmx.de> writes: >> > > By the way, does anybody know what this "infostore" stuff is >> > > about? >> > >> > Thomas does, but just in case he doesn't find his own email... >> > >> > https://www.mail-archive.com/fvwm-workers@fvwm.org/msg02706.html >> > >> > Seems reasonable, but I suggest, from infostore.h: >> > >> > MetaInfo *new_metainfo(void); >> > void insert_metainfo(char *, char *); >> > char *get_metainfo_value(const char *); >> > void print_infostore(void); >> > >> > the new, insert and get functions should all >> > use the word "infostore", not "metainfo". >> >> Hm, is this in a stable release already? I find the syntax a bit >> clumsy (the name is not very intuitive, and $[infostore....] is so >> much to type), and if while we're rewriting the parser we might >> clean that up as well. > > I don't mind. But I certainly _dislike_ the ridiculous tokens we have > now in terms of w.<foo>, i.<foo>, etc., etc. I'd much rather we > deferred that part until much later on, as I've a few notes regarding > expansion versus information coming out of fvwm (and how that's stored > in fvwm, etc.)
Just kibitzing here, but when I do re-factoring, I like to start with consistent names. I could see how changing names might cause git -> cvs issues. -- Dan Espen
