On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 10:02:17AM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > On 04 Sep 2002 11:02:01 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 07:59:49AM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > > > On 04 Sep 2002 07:50:55 +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > > > > > > > > It is " (devel)" or " (not released yet)" for the developement versions > > > > and empty for the stable releases. > > > > I missed that when reading your mail first. The idea is that the > > string is empty in *every* release. The suffix is there only in > > cvs between two releases. > > > > > Hmm, I meant "releases" not "stable releases". > > > Such DEVEL_STRING may be even used in FvwmConsole and $v if you like. > > Communication problems again... :) > > I know what is your idea. There is a difference between your solution > (changing the package version to indicate the cvs status) and my solution > (adding a human readable text to indicate the cvs status). Your solution > produces 2 problems: version comparision (2.5.4_cvs > 2.5.4) is wrong and > testing is harder, because on the last minute before a new release the > version is changed from the developed one. > > I would only use x.y.z versions without any suffix and have another way > to indicate the cvs status. This seems the only good way for allowing > smooth snapshot rpm or dep packages. But I don't want to force this.
Then how about fvwm_cvs-x.y.z instead? Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], phone: 0721/91374-382 Schlund + Partner AG, Erbprinzenstr. 4-12, D-76133 Karlsruhe -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
