On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 10:44:35AM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > On 04 Sep 2002 12:27:30 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: > > > > Then how about fvwm_cvs-x.y.z instead? > > Oh, no, fvwm-x.y.z_cvs is much better. :)
Coward ;-) > I would like to know how other projects with cvs solve this. It seems that > for most of the projects the version in cvs is simply 2.5.4 (the future > release number) immediatelly after tagging the 2.5.3 release. > > If the version is 2.5.4, but a user sees "2.5.4 (cvs)" in `fvwm -version`, > `fvwm-config` (but not `fvwm-config --version`), $v, in FvwmConsole, man > page and so on, does this accomplish your intend? Not really. In this case I'd prefer the old way. Either the "cvs" name is used everywhere or nowhere, but not in some places but not in others. Actually, it should *really* be everywhere where a user might see it: - configure summary - man page - fvwm --version - fvwm-config - tarball name - ... Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Dominik Vogt, mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], phone: 0721/91374-382 Schlund + Partner AG, Erbprinzenstr. 4-12, D-76133 Karlsruhe -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
