On 19 May 2003 22:38:30 -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > > Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > And, BTW, my vote is "yes", but the command name should be "WindowStyle". > > Maybe I'm missing something. > I never completely understood all the ins and outs of the windowstyle > proposal. Why isn't this: > > Style [ id=$[w.id] ] ....
This is the syntax I prefered some time ago too, actually: Style (Id $[w.id]) ... But now I think it is relatively bad compared to simply "WindowStyle ...", because it allows to pass incorrect parameters (unexisting window ids) and because I think it is ugly and redundant for commands and functions that by definition should work on the window context to receive window id as a parameter. Think about "WindowStyle Sticky" as equivalent of "Stick", both should work on the window context, it is just intuitive. Regards, Mikhael. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
