On 20 May 2003 11:06:10 +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > > On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 02:01:55AM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > > On 19 May 2003 20:47:13 +0200, Olivier Chapuis wrote: > > > > > > I recall my intention: style by id is a great feature, with a simple > > > _hack_ we can get it, so it is difficult to me to do not wrote such > > > code. Yes it is a "hack" it is not the new great "WindowStyle" > > > command we want (which needs more discussion and an enormous code > > > reworte). Yes it is just a simple piece of code with some theoretical > > > problems, but ok I think in practice. > > > > How exactly "StyleById <id>" is different from "WindowStyle"? > > Yes the <id> param is not useful. But, I am just afraid that the > future WindowStyle has a syntax which is not compatible. So, as > WindowStyle is reserved I will prefer an other name as StylePerWindow.
If WindowStyle is reserved, it has exactly the same syntax, just because it should do exactly the same thing. Otherwise, it is not reserved. I just like "WindowStyle" name more than StyleById or StylePerWindow. :) Regards, Mikhael. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
