On 08 Jun 2003 14:24:58 +0100, Tim Phipps wrote: > > Olivier Chapuis wrote: > > >Seems that there is no conclusion here. It seems that there is two > >votes for it (me and Mikhael) one vote against (Dominik) and one > >unclear vote (Dan). So I ask for more votes and clarification > > I've got some free time now and I was thinking of implementing the > WindowStyle command that was proposed ages ago. I think this means I > vote no (not very strongly) but I'd appreciate some help in reviewing > the proposal in the light of the current state of Fvwm.
Can you please provide some arguments? Do you see your proposed WindowStyle command any different (in terms of syntax and meaning) from the new command added by the posted patch? For me they are identical, so your ideas become more real in the long run. Or you mean that there may be the different implementation after 2.6.0? Because starting to replace Style now before 2.6.0 is not a possibility. Regards, Mikhael. -- Visit the official FVWM web page at <URL:http://www.fvwm.org/>. To unsubscribe from the list, send "unsubscribe fvwm-workers" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To report problems, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
