Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Harry portobello [10/11/2011 22:37] : >> >> Did you >> stop to think that maybe you were the cause for the lack of activity >> and you leaving is a good thing to fvwm? > > In cases like the one you've described (the main developer holding back the > community), the project tends to be forked and the community adopts the fork. > To my knowledge, this hasn't happened to FVWM. > > Emmanuel > >
The FVWM community indeed does a thing that I initially advised Harry Portobello to do: To explain. Thanks for this! I learn a lot about the rules of the open source movement. I'm sure, I'm not the only one who is understanding concepts such as this one that Emmanuel Seyman explained with this contribution just by reading these threads. Some not so good things like Harry, showing that he constantly has to to put a question mark over everything that he is surrounded with, because maybe he still doesn't have found the right strategy to manage his live, such kind of not so good things sometimes have a positive flipside: We all learn a lot :-) Michael
