On 11 May 2014 17:57, E Frank Ball III <fra...@frankb.us> wrote: > On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 02:28:19PM +0200, Thomas Funk wrote: > > > > FVWM is still an active project as you can see it on the mailing lists > > but it's true that there are many parts in the code which could be > > removed but that's not so easy. FVWM is over 20 years old and many things > > were growed over the time and interlaced with each other. > > > How will the new display managers (if that's the correct term) such as > Wayland and Mir effect fvwm? Does it have to be ported to Wayland to work?
Yes, FVWM would have to be a Wayland Compositor to be able to work correctly. Good luck with that. If I were you, I'd let the FUD die down about Wayland and concentrate on fluffier things. -- Thomas Adam
