lee <l...@yun.yagibdah.de> writes: > Thomas Adam <tho...@fvwm.org> writes: > >> So I don't want idle speculation or wonder to permeate the work I'm doing, >> the only thing FVWM will benefit from this will be bug-fixes, and I've >> already identified a few memory leaks. It's nice for FVWM in a way, it's >> being audited for free as a result of this work. > > Is the code currently in the repo on github "useful"? "Useful" would > mean that one could compile it and use it instead of fvwm.
So I cloned and compiled it, and it works --- even seems to be a lot faster than the fvwm version in Fedora. However, I have FvwmRearrange -tile -a -mn 2 -noraise 0 0 100 100 in a menu, and it doesn`t work anymore in that it doesn`t seem to do anything. Is this feature disabled/removed in mvwm? -- Knowledge is volatile and fluid. Software is power.
