On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 07:32:53PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 09:11:51AM -0700, elliot s wrote: > > > take another look at the document, since it tells you how functions could > > > be specified. > > > > I missed seeing the example, but it was as i thought. > > A function is specified all on one line, which means adding \ on all > > but last line, > > which means having to make sure \ is on all but last line. > > A source of copy/paste/delete errors while working on a function. > > No different to how things are now, so it's not anything worth mentioning, > really. > > -- Thomas Adam >
Is it worth considering moving away from line-based processing for entities like functions? Changing the example in the document to something like: Function -n func_name i:DoImmediate, c:DoClick, i:DoImmediate, i:TestRc (NoMatch) Break, h:DoHold EndFunction Just a thought. Wayne