On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 05:23:41AM -0400, Donald R Laster Jr wrote: > > When it comes to functions the cleaner format might be to use a variant of > the Bourne/Bash/"C" format such as this:
I don't think so. At best you're going to get a heredoc to slurp up multiple lines. The point here is that they're structured only in terms of the command *responsible* for handling functions. I don't want to turn the format into a scripting language; this isn't the point---we *have* FvwmPerl and others which you can use. I am not proposing we augment or change the current "scripting" behaviour of FVWM either. So no more language comparisons, please. -- Thomas Adam
