Anno domini 2020 Wed, 26 Aug 19:37:03 +0100
 Thomas Adam scripsit:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm curious about a piece of Fvwm history.  In the git log for fvwm2, the
> initial revision (which is when Jason committed the Fvwm code to CVS), notes
> the following for Fvwm 2.0.41:
> 
>       Removed FvwmPrompt (use FvwmForm instead, since it's better anyways)
> 
> This was sometime in 1998, although I'm presuming 2.0.41 was before then.
> 
> Has anyone gpt any information about FvwmPrompt?  If it were a forerunner to
> FvwmForm I've not heard of it before.  I note from the old mailing list
> archives that it was a compiled module, but I can't find the code anywhere.
> 
> Dust off the cobwebs, folks!
> 
> I'm only asking as I have just committed a new binary to Fvwm3 called
> "FvwmPrompt", and hadn't realised it had existed already.  I thought I was
> being so clever with the choice of name as well... That'll teach me!  :)
> 
> -- Thomas
> 
> 

Just saw that archive.org has a SUSE from 1996:
https://archive.org/details/suse-june_1996_release_i386

It has the oldest version of FVWM on it I have ever worked with - actually, 
that was one of the versons on the first linux disk sets that got me into linux 
:)

-r--r--r-- 1 root root  59892 Jul 27  1993 
tsx-11.mit.edu/sources/usr.bin.X11/fvwm-0.91b.tar.gz

for the versions of fvwm in question:

-r--r--r-- 1 root root 324178 Okt 29  1994 
ftp.funet.fi/util/X11/contrib/fvwm-1.24n.tar.gz
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 329170 Mai  7  1996 
ftp.uni-erlangen.de/680x0/X11R6.1/fvwm95-2.0.41e.tar.gz
-r--r--r-- 1 root root    805 Apr 18  1996 
sunsite.unc.edu-REST/X11/window-managers/fvwm-2.0.42.lsm
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root      0 Jun  7  1996 
sunsite.unc.edu-REST/X11/window-managers/fvwm-2.0.42.tar.gz-is-in-pkg-fvwm_s
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 581985 Jun  4  1996 suse/zq1/fvwm_s.tgz

None of them have FvwmPrompt in it, not these versions and not the other on the 
disks.

Looks like no version < 2.0.42 ever made it to the mirrors.


Nik

-- 
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with 
the NSA, CIA ...

Reply via email to