At Fri, 02 Feb 2024 10:55:46 -0500 Paul Fox <p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us> wrote:
> > I realize this discussion is drifting away from fvwm, but... > > ...a major part of my daily activity has always depended on X11's > ability to function on remote displays. Does that functionality > (i.e. "DISPLAY=remotehost:0" vs. "DISPLAY=:0") exist if either or > both of the hosts is based on Wayland? I believe Wayland does not support that sort of thing. > > paul > > ml-f...@srv.mx wrote: > > Also a bunch of new DE/WM and soon XFCE. There will still be diversity, > > but a new one. > > However I'm not sure Xorg will be out soon there are still missing > > features on Wayland, like screen recording (available only on Gnome), > > which means that softwares like OBS don't work on it. > > > > Le 02/02/2024 à04:28, hw a écrit : > > > On Tue, 2024-01-30 at 14:02 -0700, Jaimos Skriletz wrote: > > >> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 1:25 PM hw <h...@adminart.net> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> so is there finally a version that works for wayland? > > >>> > > >> No, fvwm only works with xorg and most likely won't be ported. > > >> > > >>> What are the differences between fvwm2 and fvwm3? > > >>> > > >> See https://github.com/fvwmorg/fvwm3/discussions/878 > > > > > > Good pointer, thanks! > > > > > > It's a pity that there's no fvwm for wayland. Xorg doesn't seem to be > > > maintainted anymore and is on the way out. That only leaves us Gnome > > > and KDE. All the diversity we used to have is gone with that. > > > > > > > > > > > =---------------------- > paul fox, p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 38.9 degrees) > > > > > -- Robert Heller -- Cell: 413-658-7953 GV: 978-633-5364 Deepwoods Software -- Custom Software Services http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Linux Administration Services hel...@deepsoft.com -- Webhosting Services
