Found that the Virtual circuit in question has (eth-s1p3c0 on both IP440's)
are going into redundant Catalyst 3548 switches.
So from FW#1, this interface goes to Port 1 on the first switch
and on FW#2, this interface goes to Port 1 on the second switch
Switches are connected with Gigabit uplinks. It doesn't appear that FW#2 is
seeing the advertisements from FW#1.
-----Original Message-----
From: hermit1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 1:30 PM
To: Tom Sevy; Check Point FW List (E-mail)
Subject: Re: [FW1] VRRP problem
Check that the interface in backup state on the first FW is monitoring the
correct interfaces. Took me two hours to find this one when it happened to
me - it was eth-s1p2 instead of eth-s1p3 in a long list of monitored
interfaces.
Check that the priorities are all correct.
hermit1
At 12:28 PM 7/3/00 -0400, Tom Sevy wrote:
>Two IP440's, VRRP running.
>
>Two quad eth cards in each.
>
>5 interfaces active, paired monitered circuits including VRRP circuit.
>
>If both IP440's are up & running, 4 interfaces on first FW are in master
>state, one in backup, and opposite on 2nd FW.
>
>Any suggestions?
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
