We are running FW-1 SP2 on NT4. We are also running Real Secure 3.2 on a
separate NT box. The powers that be want to move the FW-1 logging module
off the firewall itself to a different machine, unfortunately to the same
machine as Real Secure.
Is it advisable to put Real Secure and the Checkpoint logging tool on the
same box? If not is there a spec or benchmark for what kind of box Real
Secure should be hosted on?
Checkpoint logs typically has 250,000 lines of logs per day.
Thanks.
Brian Peters
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
