Brian,
I have the RS & fw management(WebTrends, F5's
SeeIt, etc as well) on the same system. I have a box
with lots of memory and horsepower.
The RS _engine_ should be on it's own system, because
of the horsepower needed for it to work properly. Of
course this depends on how much traffic is passing
by the fw and RS systems.
HTH,
Robert
- -
Robert P. MacDonald, Network Engineer
e-Business Infrastructure
G o r d o n F o o d S e r v i c e
Voice: +1.616.261.7987 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 8/30/00 9:14:03 AM >>>
>
>
>We are running FW-1 SP2 on NT4. We are also running Real Secure 3.2 on a
>separate NT box. The powers that be want to move the FW-1 logging module
>off the firewall itself to a different machine, unfortunately to the same
>machine as Real Secure.
>
>Is it advisable to put Real Secure and the Checkpoint logging tool on the
>same box? If not is there a spec or benchmark for what kind of box Real
>Secure should be hosted on?
>
>Checkpoint logs typically has 250,000 lines of logs per day.
>
>Thanks.
>
>Brian Peters
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
