Hello Brian,
Here is a link to the ISS web site for the Getting Started Guide for
RealSecure. See Chapter 1 for requirements. This covers RealSecure 5.0
(recently released) but requirements are the same for RealSecure 3.2.
http://documents.iss.net/literature/RealSecure/RS_GetStart_5.0.pdf
If you decide to do this, I would definitely recommend upping the RAM on the
machine to accommodate both of these programs being installed.
Regards,
Stephen
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [FW1] FW-1 and Real Secure Logging
We are running FW-1 SP2 on NT4. We are also running Real Secure 3.2 on a
separate NT box. The powers that be want to move the FW-1 logging module
off the firewall itself to a different machine, unfortunately to the same
machine as Real Secure.
Is it advisable to put Real Secure and the Checkpoint logging tool on the
same box? If not is there a spec or benchmark for what kind of box Real
Secure should be hosted on?
Checkpoint logs typically has 250,000 lines of logs per day.
Thanks.
Brian Peters
============================================================================
====
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
============================================================================
====
================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, please see the instructions at
http://www.checkpoint.com/services/mailing.html
================================================================================
