Regardless other arguments, I do think it a valid advantage for grouping
files to use suffix for all, including Interface, Abstract and future Trait.
Hope Ralph can take this into account.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:37 PM, D. J. <info...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Agreed.
> Consistent naming convention with consistent prefix or suffix makes it
> better to group relevant files.
>
> Otherwise you will find it messy:
> ...
> AbstractFoo.php
> BooSomethingA.php
> BooSomethingB.php
> ....
> FooInterface.php
> Foo.php
> FooTrait.php
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Andreas Möller <a...@softe.is> wrote:
>
>> > I think in the "Interface" in FooInterface should be referred to
>> interface
>> > declaration while "Abstract" in FooAbstract referred to abstract
>> > declaration, which makes it more meaningful and consistent both in
>> naming
>> > convention and in English
>>
>> +1 (This is what I voted, too).
>>
>> Apart from this, when scanning a directory, for example
>>
>> /library/Foo/Bar/Baz
>>
>> you will find
>>
>> BazAbstract.php
>> BazInterface.php
>> BazTrait.php
>>
>> right underneath each other. It does make things more consistent,
>> regardless of what's felt whether Baz is a noun or an adjective. One
>> can even argue that Baz becomes an adjective here ("It's the Baz way
>> of getting stuff done.").
>>
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Taiwen Jiang (aka D.J.)
>
> Build Xoops Engine
> http://www.xoopsengine.org
> web and mobile application platform
>
> CTO for EEFOCUS.com
> Leading social platform for electronics professionals
>
>
>
--
Taiwen Jiang (aka D.J.)
Build Xoops Engine
http://www.xoopsengine.org
web and mobile application platform
CTO for EEFOCUS.com
Leading social platform for electronics professionals
