Hi Sascha, The problem with Countable/Serializable and others is that you need an obvious verb to append "able" to. Unfortunately, English is not the most consistent of languages.
Here's a simple example - what would you call the interface shared by a collection of Filters? You could try Filterable but actually, the item that's filterable, is the input of a Filter and not the Filter itself. The result is a mix of interface naming standards. Some will be verb+"able", some will be nouns "interface Filter" etc. Throw in Abstracts and Traits - telling one type from another will be very hard and you'll need a postgraduate degree in grammer analysis to even figure out what to call things too often ;). Paddy On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Sascha-Oliver Prolic <saschapro...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I would like to keep interface names like serializable, countable, > etc. Is this proposal also about getting rid of them? > > Regards > > Sascha-Oliver Prolic > > -- > List: zf-contribut...@lists.zend.com > Info: http://framework.zend.com/archives > Unsubscribe: zf-contributors-unsubscr...@lists.zend.com > > -- Pádraic Brady http://blog.astrumfutura.com http://www.survivethedeepend.com Zend Framework Community Review Team -- List: fw-general@lists.zend.com Info: http://framework.zend.com/archives Unsubscribe: fw-general-unsubscr...@lists.zend.com
