En op 25 maart 2002 sprak Mark 'Doc' Rogaski: > The archives won't start until someone actually posts something.
Yep, the archives are up now. En op 25 maart 2002 sprak Stephen Turner: : : I agree that there should be a separate golf list. But I also agree that : (although it was kind of Mark to set up a list) it would be better if it : were an official @perl.org list. : : I wonder if it's possible to import any discussion to date into the : archives of a perl.org list, and transfer the list of subscribers etc.? En op 25 maart 2002 sprak Mark 'Doc' Rogaski: > If someone sets up a list that everyone feels is under a more appropriate > domain, I will forward the subscriber list to the admin (or I can act as > the admin should no one else wants to). I don't see any reason to move > things about, however. RJK> I just remembered that there is already a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. :) RJK> It was created to plan and organize the Perl Golf Apocalypse at TPC 4. RJK> Perhaps Uri would be willing to open it up for general use. uri> sure, take it over. i think ask controls it but it should be easy uri> for him to make it public. in fact i don't even think it was private, uri> just we didn't publicize it. just try to subscribe to it uri> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and see what happens. :) I just subscribed to it, sent a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and got a nice response from Uri. :) Everything seemed to work nicely. Not sure about historical archives, however. To be honest, I really like both lists! Both are devoid of any fatuous in-your-face advertising (which I detest). Doc's list seems a little more polished; on the other hand, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is perhaps a more prestigious address. I would prefer one list only, however, to avoid fragmenting the Perl golf community. So long as http://lists.perl.org/ points to the one and only golf list, it does not matter to me which one we choose. /-\ndrew
