> none of mine were Rage-based. All were Radeon. > > And you have two instances of people posting on an on-line BBS. That's > not a scientifically valid sample. I would also doubt that "thousands" > have applied this hack.
Okay, yeah, those are good points. Maybe the BBS wasn't a very scientific sample, but it still had quite a few posts at it. Probably at least a few dozen. Studies have been in the news with smaller sample sets. And although you can't assume it, it's likely that people are more likely to post if they have problems than if they don't have problems. -- G-Books is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives | -- Check our web site for refurbished PowerBooks | & CDRWs on Sale! | Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> G-Books list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-books.html> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/g-books%40mail.maclaunch.com/> --------------------------------------------------------------- >The Think Different Store http://www.ThinkDifferentStore.com ---------------------------------------------------------------
