4 x 1.2ghz would be very fast Al
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In a message dated 8/29/02 1:10:14 PM Pacific Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > if apple went to intel chips, it wouldn't be the silly pentium, it > > would be some of the risc chips that frankly should have replaced the > > pentium in pc's along time ago. intel was going to stop the > > increasingly brain dead x86 line after the original pentiums, obviously > > they couldn't get microsoft and others to go along with the idea and > > were forced to continue the silliness in order to sell chips to a > > segment that won't take the necessary step to a new architecture. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > --------------------- > I don't think Steve Jobs thinks along those lines. He's interested in coming > up with a very fast Mac. If Intel can do that for him, then you'll find the > Intel Inside label on a new Mac. He probably won't use the term Pentium in > describing the processor. > >From what my programming friends tell me, the Mac architecture is merely the > PC architecture in reverse. -- G-List is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... Small Dog Electronics http://www.smalldog.com | Refurbished Drives | -- We have Apple Refurbished Monitors in stock! | & CDRWs on Sale! | Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> G-List list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/g-list.shtml> Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/g-list%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Macintosh? Get free email and more at Applelinks! <http://www.applelinks.com>
