On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:38:34 pm Benoît Minisini wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently thinking about modifying/removing all IsXXXX() functions in > Gambas 3. > > They mainly test the datatype of their expression. So, either the datatype > is known at compile time, and there should be no need of testing it ; > either you are using a Variant, and you can use TypeOf() to get the > datatype of the value. > > I will replace them by some functions that will test if a value can be > converted safely from a string by using localization. This is what most > users expected from these functions. > > For exemple, in french localization: > > IsDate("13/2/20") -> True > IsNumber("3,34") -> True > IsInteger("3,34") -> False > IsNumber("3.34") -> False > > Internally, they will use Val() and see if the conversion works. > > I will kept most of the name, so there will be a big incompatibility > between Gambas 2, current Gambas 3, and final Gambas 3. > > What do you think about that? > > Who is using the IsXXXX() functions, and in which context?
Benoît, MAJOR PANIC! I use IsNumber extensively to do quick checks on field parsing across heterogeneous databases. Using the 80-20 rule I can parse text fields for junk appendices to an expected numeric. Code such as vItem=split(result!note," ",NULL,TRUE)[0] IF IsNumber(vItem) THEN RETURN Val(vItem) ' else begin parsing diabolical note structure ..... abounds. Please reconsider this. -- best regards Bruce Bruen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500! Tap into the largest installed PC base & get more eyes on your game by optimizing for Intel(R) Graphics Technology. Get started today with the Intel(R) Software Partner Program. Five $500 cash prizes are up for grabs. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intelisp-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Gambas-user mailing list Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user