On 23 June 2016 at 17:08, Oleg Ponomarev <onponoma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Iustin, Daniil, > > The reason for Daniil not to reply immediately is his GSoC midterm > evaluation coming soon. As the implementation represents his work during > the first month of GSoC, it's necessary to share it with the community at > this point. We have discussed your comments on design document and Daniil > took them into account. Still, I don't understand why Daniil decided not to > spend 5-10 minutes to reply in the design document discussion thread. > Oh, no worries, I just wanted to know if Daniil acknowledged the comments or not. Anyway, comments are welcome here and the discussion is still open:) > Sounds good. And thanks Daniil for the commits. > Of course, looking forward to see this implemented! thanks! iustin On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 5:49 PM 'Iustin Pop' via ganeti-devel < > ganeti-devel@googlegroups.com> wrote: > >> On 23 June 2016 at 16:45, <mele...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> From: Daniil Leshchev <mele...@gmail.com> >>> >>> The patchset introduces new command line options >>> (--long-solution-threshold" and --avoid-long-solutions"). >>> That gives an ability for HBal to avoid balancing solutions, >>> that take significant amount of time. >>> >> >> Daniil, I've replied to your design doc changes, but I haven't seen a >> reply. That discussion would be useful before implementing this :) >> >> regards, >> iustin >> >
