On 23 June 2016 at 17:42, Даниил Лещёв <mele...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Iustin > > >> Oh, no worries, I just wanted to know if Daniil acknowledged the comments >> or not. >> >> Anyway, comments are welcome here and the discussion is still open:) >>> >> >> > The only reason why I didn't reply to your comments is that I wanted to > show patchset in order to discuss ideas in design document in more detailed > way. > Hope, that was not a big mistake. > Oh no, not a mistake at all. > I'm also going to rewrite patch for design document (append information > about bandwidth tags). > I would slightly prefer if we discuss it over plain email (without patches), to see what you think about how complex the network model needs to be, and whether a static "time X" vs. semi-dynamic (based on the instance disk size) approach is best. Maybe there was some more information back at the start of the project? (I only started watching the mailing list again recently). thanks! iustin
