--- "Daniel Richard G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2006 Aug 15 10:22:09 -0700, Bernard Li wrote: > > Daniel: > > > > I agree with Martin - perhaps breaking the patch up into more > manageable > > pieces would make it easier to integrate - and we sorely need a > build > > system specailist :-) > > I can separate out some of the changes, like the s/malloc/lm_malloc/ > stuff. > Let's not go too crazy on the "one patch per distinct bugfix/feature" > > approach, however---you're not a CMM5 shop quite yet }:) > Daniel,
I demand a separate patch for every change. OK, just kidding :-) But some "logical" splitup would make reviewing and applying a bit easier. > I've plenty of experience with the standard Autoconf/Automake/Libtool > mix, > and would be happy to advise on that front. (The patch and commentary > already address the major issues I found.) > This will be highly appreciated. As for your comments: I definitely agree wit "libmetrics" belonging into top-level. "srclib" would then be solely external stuff that we want to eliminate anyways. Cheers Martin ------------------------------------------------------ Martin Knoblauch email: k n o b i AT knobisoft DOT de www: http://www.knobisoft.de
