Hi Brad: On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed, we should have an official name however since the release version > number is the only required information for tracking purposes, a release name > is not important. I originally asked Carlo to come up with a name, but he has deferred that to me and I have come up with one already, so I'll deal with it when I tag. And you are right, the name is not important at this point, the nano version number is. > Bernard, I will be out of the office on Monday-Tuesday but I propose that if > there are no responses to this thread by Monday, stating that a current > backport proposal must be included, then go ahead and tag and roll a 3.1.1 > testing tarball. Let's use the same format for the testing announcement as > we did for 3.1.0 but also include the testing criteria list that Carlo > suggested. You can either do the announcement or I can do it once I have > email access. Let me know if that works for you. I will be out of the office on Monday and will be back on Tuesday. I'll try to get things going on Tuesday but if not I can definitely do it on Wednesday. But Carlo could probably create a snapshot for testing purposes and we'll sync up on Wednesday to determine what else needs to be done. Thanks, Bernard ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
