On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: > On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 04:28:18PM -0400, Vladimir Vuksan wrote: >> >> Any thoughts on why we shouldn't make the Github our primary repository ? > > as it was explained long time ago when I proposed the same and were rejected > we will also need to change our scripts so that they will be able to work > without subversion, to make a package. > > * the svn release is used as the MICRO release number
Those should be easy to fix. We can make up our own numbers instead of using the SVN rev for the MICRO release number :-) > * the changelog is created dynamically from svn log That should be doable with git as well. > using git allows for a much more dynamic development, specially since there > are already significant codebases that are being maintained in parallel and > using svn, limits how easily they could be integrated back. > > in that same line, it would be a good idea, most likely, to allow for some > time for that people which had already diverged trees using svn to either > got those changes integrated in there, or move them to their own trees using > git, and so during that period, keeping both trees on sync somehow would > be needed. We can certainly do that. I have been syncing the gweb changes between github and SVN for a while. Shouldn't be a problem. Vladimir ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
