On Mon, 11 Jul 2011, Jesse Becker wrote:
>> the full history in svn anyway, as it was only recently that metadata was >> added for keeping track of the merges. > > And I've said before that keeping SVN around, read-only, is perfectly fine. > > I still have no objections to migrating to git, and think that a > 'best-effort' import of the existing commits is worthwhile, and keep the > SVN repository files around in case someone needs to refer back to them. Right. I wasn't suggesting we delete the SVN repo :-). I just suggested we no longer use it as our primary repo. It can stick around forever :-). Vladimir ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Ganglia-developers mailing list Ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ganglia-developers
