Tim Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1. Writers of packages which contain implementation specific code > should put compile directives in that will either throw and > error or warn the user if the variant they are using is not > supported.
Or perhaps collect all implementation-dependent code in a single place. > 2. The main reason other lisp implementations are not supported is > because the package depends heavily on sockets and there isn't > a good standard abstraction for sockets - every implementation > does it differently. We need a good standardised socket library > IMO. Someone is working on it: Reddit and Lisp psychosis http://www.findinglisp.com/blog/2005/12/reddit-and-lisp-psychosis.html Paolo -- Lisp Propulsion Laboratory log - http://www.paoloamoroso.it/log _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
