On Jan 15, 2006, at 11:08 PM, Tim Cross wrote: > I thought I'd point out an alternative package which may already > support other language encodings - the package is called s-xml (in > Debian it is cl-s-xml).
So, while Keith may have decided that cxml is the XML parser that best suits his needs, it would still be a *great* Gardening project for someone to write up a web page on the ALU Wiki explaining the differences between the different XML libraries. It may be that they all have different strengths and weaknesses and its good that there are several different ones in which case the right gardening thing to do is to provide the information people need to decide which one is right for their needs. Or it may be that there's one that's far enough ahead of the others that the garden would be improved by doing a bit of work to help it achieve total world domination. But the first step is for someone to write that comparison. Anyone? -Peter -- Peter Seibel * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gigamonkeys Consulting * http://www.gigamonkeys.com/ Practical Common Lisp * http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/ _______________________________________________ Gardeners mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/gardeners
