Actin' funny an I don know why...
'scuse me while I kiss the sky!
Oliver 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jay Cicone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 10:40 AM
To: Gatortalk@googlegroups.com <Gatortalk@googlegroups.com>
Subject: [gatortalk] Re: VS. Bama


Fluid dynamics? Bongs? Where are you going with this....or are you just
blowing smoke?

-----Original Message-----
From: Gatortalk@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sean
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 11:20 AM
To: Gatortalk@googlegroups.com
Subject: [gatortalk] Re: VS. Bama


I dusted off the bong resin enough to do these calculations:

- Kickoff from the 30 yard line (new rule last year), angled to the corner
of the goal line and sideline (the ultimate pin back) would travel 74.9
yards... so that same kick straight on would go about 5 yards deep in the
endzone.

- Kickoff from the 30 angled to the 5 yard line and the sideline (more
typical) would travel 70.26 yards, so that same kick straight on would
fall just inside the goal line.

Both of these are of course negating all the ugly realities of fluid
dynamics with the effects of wind, etc., but should suffice for the sake
of discussion : )

-Sean
Go Gators!!! Beat Bama!!!


> Steve, you may be on to something here.  I have forgotten much of the
> geometry that I used to know, but the distance from the kickoff tee to the
> five yard line sideline would likely be 5-10 yards if the kick were made
> strait to the endzone.  Could someone who remembers their geometry do the
> actual calculation?
>
>
>
> Perhaps we should be kicking it strait and maybe out of the endzone.
> Pinning a team at the 15 sometimes might not be as good as pinning them to
> the 20 ever time.
>
>
>
> Jerry
>
>
>
> From: Gatortalk@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Steve McKibben
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 12:29 PM
> To: Gatortalk@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [gatortalk] Re: VS. Bama
>
>
>
>
> I agree that the rain soaked heavy footballs were likely hard to get great
> distance from.
>
> It's ironic - after the Kentucky game, on the post game locker room show
> Meyer gushed on and on about the kick coverage team - calling them the
> best
> he's ever been around.  Since that game they've been poor. I noticed that
> during the South Carolina game Will Hill, who's probably made the majority
> of our tackles on kickoffs this year, was not on that unit. He was this
> past
> weekend, so that can't be blamed for the poor coverage.
>
> I think it was a combination of the wet fields and the fact that some
> blatant holding and illegal block penalties committed by the semis went
> uncalled (there was however a flag on every decent return we had).
>
> Meyer loves to pin the KO returner in a corner and stop them short of the
> twenty, or even the ten if we can.  He's a field position maniac. But I
> hope
> that the facts that 'bama is not a quick strike team, the seeming slump by
> our KO coverage team, a very good Tide return man in Arinas, and a dry
> ball
> convinces him to tell Sturgis to put the kickoffs into the stands behind
> the
> goalposts!
>
> Make them try and go the full 80, I don't think we can get away with
> giving
> them a short field all day the way we did against 1/2assu.
>
> --- On Mon, 12/1/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> I think alot of the special teams fiasco from this past weekend was due to
> the weather conditions.
>
> Since, UM himself is the special teams guru at Florida... I have a feeling
> that they will have something special planned for the game this weekend
> since the weather wont be a factor.
>
> Woody </table
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>








--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
GATORS: ONE VOICE ON SATURDAY - NO VOICE ON SUNDAY!
1996 National Football Champions   |   2006 National Basketball Champions
2006 National Football Champions   |   2007 National Basketball Champions
Three Heisman Trophy winners: Steve Spurrier (1966), Danny Wuerffel (1996),
Tim Tebow (2007) - Visit our website at www.gatornet.us
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to