Hats off to you for such rare observation! Definitely meaningful as well as real
ANGEL
Monty Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This talk about TOP< BOTTOM< VERSATILE etc. has been
stretched too long...........
So, I see no harm in adding my bit, based on my
observations......
Bottoms or Passive role adaptors are often clueless
how to handle a male to male interaction physically
but do feel strongly thrilled with the idea. If they
find a Top, they let him do the "needful" adjusting
well to the situation and enjoying it too ! The same
guys are at ease as Tops in a Heterosexual
relationship with virtally 100 % success and ease....
Tops are mostly Pure Gays ! They get a turn-on,
excitement n thrill in company of a male only, mostly
a passive one. They also love rugged , muscular,
sporty and middle-aged guys, indulge in rough
love-making and get thrill out of bondage, S & M etc.
Such guys fail to even fake it in company of a
female.....as is obvious by their failure to get a
hard-on !
Versatiles are the ones who get turned on by any
situation. For them Homo,Hetero, Bi, Transvestite,
Transgender.....any and everything goes ! For them
their self-gratification comes from any possible
source....and have full capacity to adapt to them.
Finally pure heteros are 100% comfortable with
females; and if situation permits, go for a cute
smooth passive guy whom they handle while fantasizing
about a female's company...........They do not prefer
body builders, rugged, masculine, hairy or middle-aged
partners. The soft n smooth twinks turn them on like
any female partner. If the guy in their company starts
getting passionate and active, they immediately loose
erection !
Hope many of us will agree to my observations....
M.
:
> Hi Cooper!
>
> I do agree with aditya's views about this group.
> Many may agree with
> your choices and many wont. But I guess its a free
> world and every
> one has the right to have their own judgement of
> whats right and
> whats wrong. As for me Im a Bisexual but Lean more
> towards the
> Homosexual side. I donot see myself living with a
> guy as Husband and
> husband (or what ever terminology). When I visualize
> myself when my
> mother is no more... I can feel the vacuum existing
> because of the
> absence of a women. No I dont need a women so that I
> can USE her to
> satisfy my emotional needs. But I believe that I can
> find a women to
> whom I could disclose my sexual orientation and live
> a peaceful
> life. What if my wife is a bisexual herself...
>
> Many might disagree with my views, but I would like
> to state taht I
> am not against their views. I am not opposed to
> lifetime committed
> gay couples, Infact I appreciate them. But this is
> what I feel
> personally.
>
>
> Regards,
> Rajeev
>
> --- In gay_bombay@yahoogroups.com, "Aditya
> Bondyopadhyay"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Cooper,
> > Please join in. Personally I do know of many
> Bisexual people who
> are on this
> > list. But one trend that I have noticed in the
> past is that when
> gay men
> > criticize some manifestations of biexuality [like
> cheating on your
> wife by
> > not disclosing that you are bisexual, while at the
> same time not
> giving your
> > fife that same freedom of sexual exploration - OR
> - getting
> married when
> > there is no intention of fulfilling the marital
> vows, but only to
> satisfy
> > social pressures or mores], bisexual people often
> cannot take it
> in their
> > stride and in the right spirit. they take an
> attack on cheating and
> > mala-fide intent to be an attack on bisexuality
> itself. This
> attitude is
> > inane at least and extremely selfish at worst.
> >
> > However, in this list people have the right to
> express themselves
> and also
> > to criticise what they feel is not OK. if you have
> it in you to
> take that
> > and keep it at a dialogue, without acting the
> injured bloke or the
> wilting
> > lily, or for that matter making it into a slanging
> match, I am
> certain that
> > people would not have any problem with you being
> here.
> >
> > Another thing that I have noticed is that you have
> repeatedly sent
> out an
> > almost identical message at least three times.
> Seems like you are
> wanting to
> > have a response so that you can create either a
> discussion string
> or a
> > debate. However after the first round, not many
> have replied to
> yuo. That is
> > the other pitfall of being in a public fora like
> this. You do not
> > necessarily always get a reply. there is a big
> probability of you
> being
> > ignored as well. You have to also learn to take
> that imn your
> stride and not
> > feel let down because of it.
> >
> > Hope you have a good time obn this list.
> >
> > best regards
> >
> > Aditya Bondyopadhyay
> >
> >
> > On 18/11/06, doc cop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > hi
> > >
> > > hav recently joined the group
> > >
> > > infact am still not sure from where i got the
> initial invitation
> for the
> > > gaybombay group
> > >
> > > as i intoduced myself earlier
> > >
> > > i am not GAY
> > >
> > > i am bisexual
> > >
> > > and after interacting with a large number of
> poeple i am very
> sure that
> > > gays and bisexuals are two absolutely differant
> personalities
> > >
> > > have been following the conversations of lately
> > >
> > > and hav been chipping in my views
> > >
> > > but all is not as simple as it sounds
> > >
> > > and as someone rightly said yesterday that we
> cannot compare any
> two or
> > > three groups as poeple in the groups itself are
> indivisuals with
> a large
> > > range of variation in personality nature and
> needs
> > >
> > > but before i proceed with my views,i wanted to
> know if the
> conversation is
> > > for GAYS onluy or BISEXUALS can join too
> > >
> > > hope we are not UNWElCOME
> > >
> > > bye
> > >
> > > cooper
> > > ===================== this group is a LGBT group
> as it says on
> home page.
> > > that means it is for lesbians, gays, bi-sexual,
> trans-gender. so
> you are
> > > welcome to posts your views. it is not necessary
> that you will
> have everyone
> > > agreeing with your views. but then that should
> not stop you from
> expressing
> > > your views. so go ahead and start emailing:)
> regards moderator
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Aditya Bondyopadhyay
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Group Site:
>
> http://www.gaybombay.info
> ==========================
> This message was posted to the gay_bombay Yahoo!
> Group. Responses to messages (by clicking "Reply")
> will also be posted on the eGroup and sent to all
> members. If you'd like to respond privately to the
> author
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________________________________
Don't pick lemons.
See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html
---------------------------------
Heres a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers
